[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <625a92b8-b629-a4ef-6176-635e1b7885db@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:27:59 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: "Li, Hua Qian" <HuaQian.Li@...mens.com>,
"wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
"linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: "kristo@...nel.org" <kristo@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"huaqianlee@...il.com" <huaqianlee@...il.com>,
"nm@...com" <nm@...com>, "vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
"Kiszka, Jan" <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Su, Bao Cheng" <baocheng.su@...mens.com>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for WDIOF_CARDRESET on TI AM65x
On 17/07/2023 08:24, Li, Hua Qian wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 08:16 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/07/2023 06:07, huaqian.li@...mens.com wrote:
>>> From: Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li@...mens.com>
>>>
>>> The watchdog hardware of TI AM65X platform does not support
>>> WDIOF_CARDRESET feature, add a reserved memory to save the watchdog
>>> reset cause, to know if the board reboot is due to a watchdog
>>> reset.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li@...mens.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - Fix the coding style.
>>> - Add usage note for the reserved memory.
>>> - Link to v3:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20230713095127.1230109-1-huaqian.li@siemens.com
>>
>> Much more changed. You added example in the bindings which no one
>> asked
>> for. Then you added multiple fake review tags to all the patches.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the wrong statement. I missed some key information and
> missunderstood `Reviewed-by`, I treated `Reviewed-by` as `Who
> has reviewed`.
But you don't have even that information who has reviewed! Where do you
see any reviews coming from me for patch #2? Where do you see reviews
from Rob for patch #3?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists