linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for WDIOF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c266f810-6fb3-2fcd-1c44-163f9b0a0dbc@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:43:38 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "Li, Hua Qian" <HuaQian.Li@...mens.com>,
        "wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Su, Bao Cheng" <baocheng.su@...mens.com>,
        "kristo@...nel.org" <kristo@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "huaqianlee@...il.com" <huaqianlee@...il.com>,
        "nm@...com" <nm@...com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Kiszka, Jan" <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        "vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for WDIOF_CARDRESET on TI AM65x

On 17/07/2023 08:34, Li, Hua Qian wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 08:27 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/07/2023 08:24, Li, Hua Qian wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 08:16 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 17/07/2023 06:07, huaqian.li@...mens.com wrote:
>>>>> From: Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li@...mens.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> The watchdog hardware of TI AM65X platform does not support
>>>>> WDIOF_CARDRESET feature, add a reserved memory to save the
>>>>> watchdog
>>>>> reset cause, to know if the board reboot is due to a watchdog
>>>>> reset.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li@...mens.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>>> - Fix the coding style.
>>>>> - Add usage note for the reserved memory.
>>>>> - Link to v3:
>>>>>  
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20230713095127.1230109-1-huaqian.li@siemens.com
>>>>
>>>> Much more changed. You added example in the bindings which no one
>>>> asked
>>>> for. Then you added multiple fake review tags to all the patches.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the wrong statement. I missed some key information and
>>> missunderstood `Reviewed-by`, I treated `Reviewed-by` as `Who
>>> has reviewed`.
>>
>> But you don't have even that information who has reviewed! Where do
>> you
>> see any reviews coming from me for patch #2? Where do you see reviews
>> from Rob for patch #3?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> I got these information from my email thread. Anyway I made a stupid
> mistake, sorry for wasting your time.
> 
> By the way, when you wrote the following in '[PATCH v3 1/3] dt-
> bindings: watchdog: ti,rti-wdt: Add support for WDIOF_CARDRESET', you
> were kind of saying that it looks good to you if I remove the extra
> empty line, right?
> 
> In any case:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

This was patch 1. But you added my review to patch 2 also. Why then not
adding to patch 3? What logic is driving this?

Best regards,
Krzysztof