[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230717071622.5992-1-duminjie@vivo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 15:16:22 +0800
From: Minjie Du <duminjie@...o.com>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org (open list:BTRFS FILE SYSTEM),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com, Minjie Du <duminjie@...o.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] btrfs: increase usage of folio_next_index() helper
Simplify code pattern of 'folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio)' by using
the existing helper folio_next_index().
Signed-off-by: Minjie Du <duminjie@...o.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 094004c11..d1c44e17d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -2127,7 +2127,7 @@ static int extent_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
for (i = 0; i < nr_folios; i++) {
struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i];
- done_index = folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio);
+ done_index = folio_next_index(folio);
/*
* At this point we hold neither the i_pages lock nor
* the page lock: the page may be truncated or
--
2.39.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists