[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd808f96-29a9-8a64-8e53-e3ffb1f00417@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 22:00:41 +0800
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@...wei.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <soc@...nel.org>,
<wanghuiqiang@...wei.com>, <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>,
<liuyonglong@...wei.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
<arnd@...db.de>, <sudeep.holla@....com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <lihuisong@...wei.com>,
"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] soc: hisilicon: Support HCCS driver on Kunpeng SoC
在 2023/7/18 18:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
> On 18/07/2023 10:07, lihuisong (C) wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> Thank you for your reply.
>>
>>
>> 在 2023/7/17 20:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>>> On 14/07/2023 08:17, lihuisong (C) wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Can you take a look at this series?
>>> People you listed in "To:" field are not maintainers of HiSilicon, so
>>> why pinging us?
>> This "To:" field are from the get_maintainer.pl script.
>> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f ./drivers/soc/
> Which is not really correct. Why would you send it to maintainers of
> Samsung or NXP?
Yeah, that's not entirely correct.
I should skip other SOC maintainers from the output of the script.
The reason why I send to some maintainers in "To" field is that some of
them have kindly reviewed my patch before.
>
>> The hisilicon in drivers/soc/ is created for the first time. So there
>> are no maintainer of HiSilicon.
> There are. Open MAINTAINERS file, use search and voila.
got it, thanks.
>
>> Thanks for reminder.
>> add HiSilicon SOC maintainer Wei Xu.
>>> HiSilicon DTS has numerous issues, so if you want to increase the
>>> chances anyone cares about your patch, please contribute to fixing and
>>> improving your company DTS. See for example commit b2bbc8687 which is
>>> bad (underscores are not allowed) or 1860a51823 which is just wrong. The
>>> latter one is being fixed, although I do not see the fix being picked
>>> up... my feelings are the platform is just dead.
>> The HCCS driver has nothing to do with HiSilicon DTS.
>> So I cannot understand why you say DTS.
> I grunted about poor support for HiSilicon. Because both - HiSilicon DTS
> and HiSilicon SoC HCCS driver - are for HiSilicon.
This driver works on kunpneg SOC platform, which isn't related to
something you mentioned.
>
> Now, why don't you help the maintainers review/fix stuff so they will
> have more time for your patch?
Yes, this is helpful and reasonable. Would do it if I have the chance.
Best regards,
Huisong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists