[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230718144310.4887-1-ante.knezic@helmholz.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:43:10 +0200
From: Ante Knezic <ante.knezic@...mholz.de>
To: <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <andrew@...n.ch>, <ante.knezic@...mholz.de>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add erratum 3.14 for 88E6390X and 88E6190X
> It does not apply cleanly to net-next. Please respin. You can retain
> Andrew's Reviewed-by tag.
Respin might need a complete rework of the patch as with the
conversion of 88e639x to phylink_pcs (introduced with commit
e5b732a275f5fae0f1342fb8cf76de654cd51e50) the original code flow
has completely changed so it will not be as simple as finding a new
place to stick the patch.
The new phylink mostly hides away mv88e6xxx_chip struct which is needed
to identify the correct device and writing to relevant registers has also
changed in favor of mv88e639x_pcs struct etc.
I think you can see where I am going with this. In this sense I am not sure
about keeping the Reviewed-by tag, more likely a complete rewrite
should be done.
I will repost V3 once I figure out how to make it work with the new
framework.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists