linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add erratum 3.14 for 88E6390X and 88E6190X

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230718150133.4wpnmtks46yxg5lz@skbuf>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2023 18:01:33 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Ante Knezic <ante.knezic@...mholz.de>
Cc:     pabeni@...hat.com, andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add erratum 3.14 for
 88E6390X and 88E6190X

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 04:43:10PM +0200, Ante Knezic wrote:
> > It does not apply cleanly to net-next. Please respin. You can retain
> > Andrew's Reviewed-by tag.
> 
> Respin might need a complete rework of the patch as with the
> conversion of 88e639x to phylink_pcs (introduced with commit
> e5b732a275f5fae0f1342fb8cf76de654cd51e50) the original code flow
> has completely changed so it will not be as simple as finding a new
> place to stick the patch. 
> The new phylink mostly hides away mv88e6xxx_chip struct which is needed 
> to identify the correct device and writing to relevant registers has also
> changed in favor of mv88e639x_pcs struct etc.
> I think you can see where I am going with this. In this sense I am not sure 
> about keeping the Reviewed-by tag, more likely a complete rewrite 
> should be done.
> I will repost V3 once I figure out how to make it work with the new
> framework.
> 

Can't you simply replicate the positioning of mv88e6393x_erratum_4_6()
from mv88e6393x_pcs_init()?