linux-kernel - Re: Qt6 port of kconfig qconf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <boris.20230718060325@codesynthesis.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2023 06:13:09 +0200
From:   Boris Kolpackov <boris@...esynthesis.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Qt6 port of kconfig qconf

Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> writes:

> I like 1 or 2, depending on the size of #if soup.

Looks like it won't be too dense if we are willing to only care about
the latest version of Qt5 (i.e., 5.15.0 or later) since most of the
changes appear to also work in the latest Qt5 (they may also work in
earlier versions, but I don't have easy access to those to check).

Should we go with support for "latest Qt5" and Qt6?