linux-kernel - Re: Qt6 port of kconfig qconf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNARt3do8BR2eUp4JscgCwsHy9Kz=KHHnAvrB7v7yO1FJrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 15:37:32 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Boris Kolpackov <boris@...esynthesis.com>
Cc:     linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Qt6 port of kconfig qconf

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 1:12 PM Boris Kolpackov <boris@...esynthesis.com> wrote:
>
> Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > I like 1 or 2, depending on the size of #if soup.
>
> Looks like it won't be too dense if we are willing to only care about
> the latest version of Qt5 (i.e., 5.15.0 or later) since most of the
> changes appear to also work in the latest Qt5 (they may also work in
> earlier versions, but I don't have easy access to those to check).
>
> Should we go with support for "latest Qt5" and Qt6?


Yeah, I think so.




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada