lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168968220008.40723.6109543633673896312.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2023 13:10:00 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc:     imx@...ts.linux.dev, shengjiu.wang@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: codec: wm8960: add additional probe check
 for codec identification

On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:25:12 -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> The wm8960 codec is not readable, resulting in a NACK for address 0x3d (8-bit).
> This can partially indicate it. For example: wm8962 codec use the same address
> but is readable. This additional probe check will help prevent loading the wm8960
> module incorrectly on wm8962 hardware.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: codec: wm8960: add additional probe check for codec identification
      commit: 8b30cdbe0b911562fc1496078162dc9547b69be5

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ