[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba1652bb-4bf1-95c0-683e-474d07edad75@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:08:48 +0530
From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dan.carpenter@...aro.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
error27@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] media: i2c: fix error handling in
ub960_rxport_add_serializer()
Hi Tomi,
On 18/07/23 7:01 pm, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18/07/2023 11:58, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
>> Smatch warns:
>> drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c:1671 ub960_rxport_add_serializer():
>> err: 'rxport->ser.client' dereferencing possible ERR_PTR()
>>
>> i2c_new_client_device() returns error pointers on failure and in
>> dev_dbg statement we are dereferencing error pointer which is a bug.
>>
>> Fix this by using IS_ERR() which checks for error pointers.
>>
>> Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> Found with static analysis, only compile tested. Although in
>> drivers/media i2c_client_has_driver() checks are present, IS_ERR() would
>> probably be sufficient here.
>> ---
>> drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
>> b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
>> index e101bcf2356a..88144e3ec183 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
>> @@ -1662,7 +1662,7 @@ static int ub960_rxport_add_serializer(struct
>> ub960_data *priv, u8 nport)
>> ser_info.addr = rxport->ser.alias;
>> rxport->ser.client =
>> i2c_new_client_device(priv->client->adapter, &ser_info);
>> - if (!rxport->ser.client) {
>> + if (IS_ERR(rxport->ser.client)) {
>> dev_err(dev, "rx%u: cannot add %s i2c device", nport,
>> ser_info.type);
>> return -EIO;
>
> Good catch. I think this should be modified to return
> PTR_ERR(rxport->ser.client) instead of -EIO. Do you want to update the
> patch or shall I do the change?
Thanks,
I think it is easier for me to do that change PTR_ERR change. Will send
V2 with that change added.
Regards,
Harshit
>
> Tomi
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists