[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230719144048.4f340b8aa0a29ab65a274273@hugovil.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 14:40:48 -0400
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
tomasz.mon@...lingroup.com, l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] serial: sc16is7xx: fix regression with GPIO
configuration
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:16:45 -0400
Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:45:51 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 6:42 PM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:35:48 +0300
> > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 6:33 PM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:18:12 +0300
> > > > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 5:08 PM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 22:31:04 +0300
> > > > > > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > > > did you have a chance to look at V8 (sent two weks ago) which fixed all
> > > > > > > of what we discussed?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The patch 6 already has my tag, anything specific you want me to do?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Andy,
> > > > > I forgot to remove your "Reviewed-by: Andy..." tag before sending V8
> > > > > since there were some changes involved in patch 6 and I wanted you to
> > > > > review them. Can you confirm if the changes are correct?
> > > > >
> > > > > I also added a new patch "remove obsolete out_thread label". It has no
> > > > > real impact on the code generation itself, but maybe you can review and
> > > > > confirm if tags are ok or not, based on commit message and also
> > > > > additional commit message.
> > > >
> > > > Both are fine to me.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > Ok, thank you for reviewing this.
> > >
> > > I guess now we are good to go with this series if the stable tags and
> > > patches order are good after Greg's review?
> >
> > Taking into account that we are at rc7, and even with Fixes tags in
> > your series I think Greg might take this after v6.5-0rc1 is out. It's
> > up to him how to proceed with that. Note, he usually has thousands of
> > patches in backlog, you might need to respin it after the above
> > mentioned rc1.
>
> Ok, understood.
>
> Let's wait then.
Hi Andy/Greg,
we are now at v6.5-rc2 and I still do not see any of our patches in
linus or gregkh_tty repos.
Is there something missing from my part (or someone else) to go forward
with integrating these patches (v8) for v6.5?
Thank you,
Hugo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists