[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023071922-rigor-collage-804e@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 21:14:23 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
tomasz.mon@...lingroup.com, l.perczak@...lintechnologies.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] serial: sc16is7xx: fix regression with GPIO
configuration
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 02:40:48PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:16:45 -0400
> Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:45:51 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 6:42 PM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:35:48 +0300
> > > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 6:33 PM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:18:12 +0300
> > > > > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 5:08 PM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 22:31:04 +0300
> > > > > > > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > > > > > did you have a chance to look at V8 (sent two weks ago) which fixed all
> > > > > > > > of what we discussed?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The patch 6 already has my tag, anything specific you want me to do?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Andy,
> > > > > > I forgot to remove your "Reviewed-by: Andy..." tag before sending V8
> > > > > > since there were some changes involved in patch 6 and I wanted you to
> > > > > > review them. Can you confirm if the changes are correct?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I also added a new patch "remove obsolete out_thread label". It has no
> > > > > > real impact on the code generation itself, but maybe you can review and
> > > > > > confirm if tags are ok or not, based on commit message and also
> > > > > > additional commit message.
> > > > >
> > > > > Both are fine to me.
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Ok, thank you for reviewing this.
> > > >
> > > > I guess now we are good to go with this series if the stable tags and
> > > > patches order are good after Greg's review?
> > >
> > > Taking into account that we are at rc7, and even with Fixes tags in
> > > your series I think Greg might take this after v6.5-0rc1 is out. It's
> > > up to him how to proceed with that. Note, he usually has thousands of
> > > patches in backlog, you might need to respin it after the above
> > > mentioned rc1.
> >
> > Ok, understood.
> >
> > Let's wait then.
>
> Hi Andy/Greg,
> we are now at v6.5-rc2 and I still do not see any of our patches in
> linus or gregkh_tty repos.
>
> Is there something missing from my part (or someone else) to go forward
> with integrating these patches (v8) for v6.5?
My queue is huge right now, please be patient, I want to have them all
handled by the end of next week...
You can always help out by reviewing other patches on the mailing list
to reduce my review load.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists