lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <860fffab-3c48-027d-aa2e-b15fc8f7a760@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2023 09:43:03 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     alina_yu@...htek.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add Richtek
 RTQ2208 SubPMIC

On 19/07/2023 06:25, alina_yu@...htek.com wrote:
> From: alinayu <alina_yu@...htek.com>
> 
> Add bindings for Richtek RTQ2208 IC controlled SubPMIC
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alina Yu <alina_yu@...htek.com>
> ---
> v3
> - Fix some typos
> - Modify the descriptions for "richtek,mtp-sel"
> - Modify the node name to lowercase and remove underscore
> - Remove '|' from description
> - Remove "regulator-compatible" from property
> - Remove "regulator-state-mem" from pattern
> - Modify node name to generic one
> ---
>  .../regulator/richtek,rtq2208-regulator.yaml       | 206 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 206 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rtq2208-regulator.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rtq2208-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rtq2208-regulator.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2fc92e5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/richtek,rtq2208-regulator.yaml

No improvements here.

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ