linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] led: flash: various minor fixes for leds-qcom-flash driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2023 09:50:29 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To:     Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        pavel@....cz, ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
        Alice Chen <alice_chen@...htek.com>,
        ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
        Dylan Van Assche <me@...anvanassche.be>,
        Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        quic_collinsd@...cinc.com, quic_subbaram@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] led: flash: various minor fixes for leds-qcom-flash
 driver

On Tue, 18 Jul 2023, Fenglin Wu wrote:

> 
> 
> On 7/18/2023 5:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 18/07/2023 11:24, Fenglin Wu wrote:
> > > Update the driver to address following minor issues:
> > >   - Add a sentence in Kconfig to explain the driver can be compiled
> > >     as a module
> > >   - strobe off the LED channel before setting flash current to prevent
> > >     the flash LED being lit with an incorrect brightness if it was
> > >     already active in torch mode
> > >   - put the child node if register any flash LED device failed.
> > 
> > Don't mix different fixes and changes in one commit.
> > 
> > Also, please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary
> > people and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument). I
> > really do not see a point why I am cc-ed here.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> 
> I understood that we should separate the changes for different fixes.
> 
> I am trying to address the review comment from Pavel that was coming late
> after the original changes were applied:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230325170957.GA2904@bug/ (sorry for
> just got time to work on this), since all of them are small ones and all
> related with the same driver, so I thought it might be good to put them
> together and update with a single patch?

Separate patches - one per functional change please.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]