[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86cbedcd-692b-ecb8-2075-d50835739bcf@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 10:59:01 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: "Li, Meng" <Meng.Li@...driver.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"dinguyen@...nel.org" <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
"hminas@...opsys.com" <hminas@...opsys.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: usb: dwc2: add compatible
"intel,socfpga-stratix10-hsotg"
On 19/07/2023 10:45, Li, Meng wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 2:39 PM
>> To: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@...driver.com>; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org;
>> robh+dt@...nel.org; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org; conor+dt@...nel.org;
>> dinguyen@...nel.org; hminas@...opsys.com; linux-usb@...r.kernel.org;
>> devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: usb: dwc2: add compatible "intel,socfpga-
>> stratix10-hsotg"
>>
>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
>> know the content is safe.
>>
>> On 19/07/2023 04:55, Meng Li wrote:
>>> Add the compatible "intel,socfpga-stratix10-hsotg" to the DWC2
>>> implementation, because the Stratix DWC2 implementation does not
>>> support clock gating. This compatible is used with generic snps,dwc2.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Meng Li <Meng.Li@...driver.com>
>>
>> Missing changelog, missing versioning. This is v3 or v4.
>>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml
>>> index dc4988c0009c..f90094320914 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml
>>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ properties:
>>> - amlogic,meson-g12a-usb
>>> - amlogic,meson-a1-usb
>>> - intel,socfpga-agilex-hsotg
>>> + - intel,socfpga-stratix10-hsotg
>>
>> So you just sent the same patch as before. I pointed you to the proper solution
>> with compatibility.
>>
>
> No. not the same.
> I don't understand why SoC specific compatible "intel,socfpga-agilex-hsotg" is able to be added, but the SoC specific compatible "intel,socfpga-stratix10-hsotg" is not allowed.
>
> You said "Where is SoC specific compatible?"
> Now, I add the SoC specific compatible "intel,socfpga-stratix10-hsotg", but why it is still not reasonable.
The compatible should be added, but I said they are compatible, so
express it. I also gave you example of file which expresses it.
Why that compatible is not allowed alone? Because what we said here
many, many times and because the doc I gave you which explains this.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists