lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:38:16 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Alina Yu <alina_yu@...htek.com>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add Richtek
 RTQ2208 SubPMIC

On 20/07/2023 10:07, Alina Yu wrote:
> Hi,
> Krzysztof:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:44:45AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 19/07/2023 11:24, alina_yu@...htek.com wrote:
>>> From: alinayu <alina_yu@...htek.com>
>>>
>>> Add bindings for Richtek RTQ2208 IC controlled SubPMIC
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alina Yu <alina_yu@...htek.com>
>>> ---
>>> v4
>>> - Modify filename to "richtek,rtq2208"
>>> - Add more desciptions for "regulator-allowed-modes"
> 
> ...
> 
>>> +
>>> +          regulator-mode:
>>> +            enum: [0, 1]
>>> +            description:
>>> +              describe buck initial operating mode in suspend state.
>>
>> There is no such property on this level. Aren't you mixing initial one?
> 
> It's the initial mode in suspend-mem state, should I modify that like this ?
>         patternProperties:
>           "^regulator-state-(standby|mem|disk)$":
> 	    type: object
> 	    $ref: regulator.yaml#
> 	    properties:
> 	      regulator-mode:
> 	        enum: [0, 1]
> 		description:
>                   describe byck initial operating mode in suspend state.

Please check how other bindings do it.

> ...
> 
>>
>>> +            enum: [ 900000, 1200000, 1800000, 3300000 ]
>>> +            description:
>>> +              the fixed voltage in micro volt which is decided at the factory.
>>
>> I don't understand this property. Why this is different from min/max
> 
> 
> Because ldo has fixed voltage, so I thinks I could use a property to
> represent the fixed voltage directly. Do you suggest me modifying that like this:
> 
> regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <900000>;
> 
> Using min voltage equals to max voltage to represent fixed voltage, instead of self-defined property ?

Yes.



Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ