[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202307210139.6iUpmzwe-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:55:38 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: alina_yu@...htek.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, alina_yu@...htek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] regulator: rtq2208: Add Richtek RTQ2208 SubPMIC
driver
Hi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on broonie-regulator/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.5-rc2 next-20230720]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/alina_yu-richtek-com/regulator-dt-bindings-rtq2208-Add-Richtek-RTQ2208-SubPMIC/20230719-172722
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1689758686-14409-3-git-send-email-alina_yu%40richtek.com
patch subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] regulator: rtq2208: Add Richtek RTQ2208 SubPMIC driver
config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230721/202307210139.6iUpmzwe-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230721/202307210139.6iUpmzwe-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307210139.6iUpmzwe-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/regulator/rtq2208-regulator.c: In function 'rtq2208_set_ramp_delay':
>> drivers/regulator/rtq2208-regulator.c:154:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_PREP' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
154 | val = FIELD_PREP(RTQ2208_BUCK_RSPUP_MASK, sel) | FIELD_PREP(RTQ2208_BUCK_RSPDN_MASK, sel);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/FIELD_PREP +154 drivers/regulator/rtq2208-regulator.c
124
125 static int rtq2208_set_ramp_delay(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int ramp_delay)
126 {
127 const struct regulator_desc *rdesc = rdev->desc;
128 unsigned int sel = 0, val;
129
130 ramp_delay = max(ramp_delay, RTQ2208_RAMP_VALUE_MIN_uV);
131 ramp_delay = min(ramp_delay, RTQ2208_RAMP_VALUE_MAX_uV);
132
133 ramp_delay /= RTQ2208_RAMP_VALUE_MIN_uV;
134
135 /*
136 * fls(ramp_delay) - 1: doing LSB shift, let it starts from 0
137 *
138 * RTQ2208_BUCK_RAMP_SEL_MASK - sel: doing descending order shifting.
139 * Because the relation of seleltion and value is like that
140 *
141 * seletion: value
142 * 000: 64mv
143 * 001: 32mv
144 * ...
145 * 111: 0.5mv
146 *
147 * For example, if I would like to select 64mv, the fls(ramp_delay) - 1 will be 0b111,
148 * and I need to use 0b111 - sel to do the shifting
149 */
150
151 sel = fls(ramp_delay) - 1;
152 sel = RTQ2208_BUCK_RAMP_SEL_MASK - sel;
153
> 154 val = FIELD_PREP(RTQ2208_BUCK_RSPUP_MASK, sel) | FIELD_PREP(RTQ2208_BUCK_RSPDN_MASK, sel);
155
156 return regmap_update_bits(rdev->regmap, rdesc->ramp_reg,
157 RTQ2208_BUCK_RSPUP_MASK | RTQ2208_BUCK_RSPDN_MASK, val);
158 }
159
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists