[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25942dafbc7f52488a30c807b6322109539442cf@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 08:47:37 +0000
From: "Yajun Deng" <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>
Cc: corbet@....net, hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
robin.murphy@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, kim.phillips@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
July 20, 2023 at 4:25 PM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> It turns out this doesn't apply at all. Can you resend it against
> Linus' latest tree?
>
It's based on linux-next tree.
This patch should be after my other patch in linux-next tree.
a960925a6b23("dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures").
Powered by blists - more mailing lists