[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230720115408.GA13114@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:54:08 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, corbet@....net,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, kim.phillips@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 08:47:37AM +0000, Yajun Deng wrote:
> It's based on linux-next tree.
>
> This patch should be after my other patch in linux-next tree.
> a960925a6b23("dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures").
Where did this land? dma patches really should be going through
the DMA tree..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists