[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46663f3b-44b8-f2b6-df4b-9d639b3aff66@starfivetech.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:35:15 +0800
From: Guo Samin <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>,
Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Add ethernet nodes for StarFive JH7110 SoC
on 2023/7/21 17:16:41, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 03:27:33PM +0800, Guo Samin wrote:
>
>> Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Add ethernet nodes for StarFive JH7110 SoC
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
>
>> to: Guo Samin <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
>> data: 2023/7/21
>
> btw, please try and remove this stuff from your mails.
>
Sure
>>> On 21 July 2023 03:09:19 IST, Guo Samin <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com> wrote:
>
>>>> There is a question about the configuration of phy that I would like to consult you.
>>>>
>>>> Latest on motorcomm PHY V5[1]: Follow Rob Herring's advice
>>>> motorcomm,rx-xxx-driver-strength Changed to motorcomm,rx-xxx-drv-microamp .
>>>> V5 has already received a reviewed-by from Andrew Lunn, and it should not change again.
>>>>
>>>> Should I submit another pacthes based on riscv-dt-for-next?
>>>
>>> Huh, dtbs_check passed for these patches,
>>> I didn't realise changes to the motorcomm stuff
>>> were a dep. for this. I'll take a look later.
>
>> After discussing with HAL, I have prepared the code and considered adding the following patch to
>> Motorcomm's patchsetes v6. (To fix some spelling errors in v5[1])
>> which will then send patches based on linux-next. What do you think? @Andrew @Conor
>
> I think you are better off just sending the dts patch to me, adding a
> dts patch that will not apply to net-next to your motorcomm driver series
> will only really cause problems for the netdev patchwork automation.
>
Okay, I'll send you DTS separately.
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20230720111509.21843-1-samin.guo@starfivetech.com
>
> I meant to ack this yesterday, but it wasn't in my dt-binding review
> queue. I'll go do that now.
Best regards,
Samin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists