linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] soc: qcom: llcc: Refactor llcc driver to support multiple configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <166e73d1-a158-2da8-09ea-541fbc3241dc@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2023 21:44:18 +0530
From:   Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@...cinc.com>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] soc: qcom: llcc: Refactor llcc driver to support
 multiple configuration



On 7/24/2023 6:56 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/07/2023 14:28, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>> On 7/24/2023 2:11 PM, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>>> Refactor driver to support multiple configuration for llcc on a target.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 264 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>    1 file changed, 178 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
>>> index 67c19ed2219a..321f8d2079f7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
>>> @@ -127,6 +127,12 @@ struct qcom_llcc_config {
>>>    	bool no_edac;
>>>    };
>>>    
>>> +struct qcom_sct_config
>>
>> const ?
> 
> What (and how) should be const above?

  left over, thanks for catching..

-Mukesh

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>