[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e093a52d-e36f-ec26-e218-1e3b3b400e34@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 20:21:51 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Delphine_CC_Chiu/WYHQ/Wiwynn <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>
Cc: "patrick@...cx.xyz" <patrick@...cx.xyz>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add lltc ltc4286 driver
bindings
On 7/23/23 19:12, Delphine_CC_Chiu/WYHQ/Wiwynn wrote:
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + enum:
>>> + - lltc,ltc4286
>>> + - lltc,ltc4287
>>
>> There is no LTC4287, at least according to the Analog website.
> It has been announced on Analog Devices website.
> Please refer to this link: https://www.analog.com/en/products/ltc2487.html#product-overview
>
No, that is wrong. You are pointing to ltc2487, which is something
completely different.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists