linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] efivarfs: automatically update super block flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC_iWj+-h+TbuesypQ-PpwFYOUOZ-vjd2C6dWb1oSBt7jEviPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:21:44 +0300
From:   Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To:     Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
        Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] efivarfs: automatically update super block flag

Hi Kojima-san,

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 05:53, Masahisa Kojima
<masahisa.kojima@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ilias, Jan,
>
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 03:56, Ilias Apalodimas
> <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kojima-san, Jan
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:58:50PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > On 22.06.23 10:51, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > > > efivar operation is updated when the tee_stmm_efi module is probed.
> > > > tee_stmm_efi module supports SetVariable runtime service,
> > > > but user needs to manually remount the efivarfs as RW to enable
> > > > the write access if the previous efivar operation does not support
> > > > SerVariable and efivarfs is mounted as read-only.
> > > >
> > > > This commit notifies the update of efivar operation to
> > > > efivarfs subsystem, then drops SB_RDONLY flag if the efivar
> > > > operation supports SetVariable.
> > >
> > > But it does not re-add it and prevents further requests to the TA (that
> > > will only cause panics there) when the daemon terminates, does it?
> >
> > It doesn't, but I think I got a better way out.  Even what you suggest won't
> > solve the problem entirely.  For the sake of context
> > - The kernel decides between the RO/RW depending on the SetVariable ptr
> > - The stmm *module* registers and swaps the RT calls -- and the ptr is now
> > valid.  Note here that the module probe function will run only if the
> > supplicant is running
> > - Once the module is inserted the filesystem will be remounted even without
> > the supplicant running, which would not trigger an oops, but an hard to
> > decipher error message from OP-TEE.
> >
> > So even if we switch the permissions back to RO when the supplicant dies,
> > someone can still remount it as RW and trigger the same error.
> >
> > Which got me thinking and staring the TEE subsystem a bit more.  The
> > supplicant is backed by a /dev file, which naturally has .open() and
> > .release() callbacks.  Why don't we leave the module perform the initial
> > setup -- e.g talk to StMM and make sure it's there, setup the necessary
> > buffers etc and defer the actual swapping of the efivar ops and the
> > filesystem permissions there?  I might 'feel' a bit weird, but as I
> > mentioned the module probe function only runs if the supplicant is running
> > anyway
>
> I think we are discussing two issues.
>

Yes

> 1) efivar ops is not restored when the tee-supplicant daemon terminates.
>
> The patch[1] sent by Sumit addresses this issue.
> Thanks to this patch, 'remove' callback of tee_stmm_efi_driver is called
> when the tee-supplicant daemon terminates, then restore the previous efivar ops
> and SB_RDONLY flag if necessary.

Ok but that didn't fix the original error Jan reported and I am not
sure about the patch status

>
> 2) cause panic when someone remounts the efivarfs as RW even if
> SetVariable is not supported.

Yes, this [0] is fixing that issue

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/20230609094532.562934-1-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org/
Thanks
/Ilias
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230607151435.92654-1-sumit.garg@linaro.org/
>
> Thanks,
> Masahisa Kojima
>
> >
> > Cheers
> > /Ilias
> >
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > --
> > > Siemens AG, Technology
> > > Competence Center Embedded Linux
> > >