[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZL/e9oguxJ8+nht/@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:40:54 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: core-api: Drop :export: for
int_log.h
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 03:27:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:06:30PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:46:33PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Is this the same patch I applied yesterday or a different one?
>
> > Hmm...
> > I do not see anything like this patch in your current ASoC for-next
> > (nor in for-6.6). Did I look into wrong branch?
>
> There was some random patch you just sent me the message ID for in the
> replies to something from Stephen which I'm fairly sure I queued,
> perhaps it was a different thing or git thought it was a noop when it
> was applied?
The first version is here [1].
Then it was a discussion about Linux Next build issues [2].
In the discussion I mentioned:
The 20230713165320.14199-1-andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com had been sent.
which is exactly what [1] is.
I have no idea how it can be a noop, but the patch is missing as far
as I can tell.
This thread is v2 of what was in [1].
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20230713165320.14199-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20230713121627.17990c86@canb.auug.org.au/T/#u
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists