[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZL/gAORYFijgjfvH@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 21:45:20 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kselftest Mailing List
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] tools/nolibc: add support for powerpc
Hi Zhangjin,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 07:02:55PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> Btw, have checked "=r" instead of "=a" works on i386 too for we already
> bind the _ret variable with "RET" register, but still need to check if
> "=a" is necessary?
I need to tell you that syscall6() for i386 can't use "r" and "=r"
because there was a historical bug that made GCC stuck in a loop forever
when compiling the nolibc code. It's already fixed in the latest version
of GCC, but we should still support older compilers.
Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105032
I discovered that bug in 2022 in the latest version of GCC at that time,
so it's pretty new, and those buggy versions are very likely still in
the wild today.
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists