linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Fix the I2C7 interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40e3d1d7-468a-c822-6f2c-6c46f4a02f5d@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:30:11 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     qaz6750 lzy <qaz6750@...look.com>, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org
Cc:     conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Fix the I2C7 interrupt

On 25/07/2023 04:33, qaz6750 lzy wrote:
> I2C6 and I2C7 use the same interrupts, which is incorrect.
> In the downstream kernel, I2C7 has interrupts of 608 instead of 607.
> 
> Signed-off-by: qaz6750 lzy <qaz6750@...look.com>

Neither From field nor Signed-off-by have the full name you mentioned
before.

Also: Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads
(unrelated or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and
might interfere with applying entire sets.

Best regards,
Krzysztof