linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Fix the I2C7 interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SY7P282MB3787D64A586E9DC55547BB2DB203A@SY7P282MB3787.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:55:34 +0800
From:   qaz6750 lzy <qaz6750@...look.com>
To:     konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org
Cc:     conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Fix the I2C7 interrupt

On 25/07/2023 13:50, qaz6750 lzy wrote:
>On 25/07/2023 04:33, qaz6750 lzy wrote:
>> I2C6 and I2C7 use the same interrupts, which is incorrect.
>> In the downstream kernel, I2C7 has interrupts of 608 instead of 607.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: qaz6750 lzy <qaz6750@...look.com>
>
>Neither From field nor Signed-off-by have the full name you mentioned
before.
>
>Also: Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads
>(unrelated or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and
>might interfere with applying entire sets.

I'm sorry, this is my problem. As this is my first time submitting a patch,
I made some mistakes. So, what else do I need to do now? Thank you

I appreciate all your help,
qaz6750 lzy