linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Fix the I2C7 interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:42:06 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     qaz6750 lzy <qaz6750@...look.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org
Cc:     conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Fix the I2C7 interrupt

On 25.07.2023 07:55, qaz6750 lzy wrote:
> On 25/07/2023 13:50, qaz6750 lzy wrote:
>> On 25/07/2023 04:33, qaz6750 lzy wrote:
>>> I2C6 and I2C7 use the same interrupts, which is incorrect.
>>> In the downstream kernel, I2C7 has interrupts of 608 instead of 607.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: qaz6750 lzy <qaz6750@...look.com>
>>
>> Neither From field nor Signed-off-by have the full name you mentioned
> before.
>>
>> Also: Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads
>> (unrelated or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and
>> might interfere with applying entire sets.
> 
> I'm sorry, this is my problem. As this is my first time submitting a patch,
> I made some mistakes. So, what else do I need to do now? Thank you
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

Konrad