linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] xen: Update dm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230725074218.zcgbkkx5pfgszimu@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:12:18 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
        stratos-dev@...lists.linaro.org,
        Erik Schilling <erik.schilling@...aro.org>,
        Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] xen: Update dm_op.h from Xen public header

On 25-07-23, 09:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I question that use, btw, but it is not up to me to decide whether to
> accept such a layering violation in Linux. dm-op is, as its name says,
> for device models to use. Your intended use doesn't fall in that
> category, aiui. Imo the present contents of dm_op.h in Linux is indeed
> all a kernel is supposed to know about, unless it was to gain in-kernel
> device models.

Is there any other way by which an interrupt can be raised for the
guest VM ? I was only aware of this method and so implemented it like
this.

I am open to suggestions on this.

-- 
viresh