[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <314b21abaade55ba55ccdd930f9fdf24028cadf0.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:50:56 +0200
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@...weicloud.com>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        "open list:SUPERH" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>,
        petr@...arici.cz, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] sh: boards: fix CEU buffer size passed to
 dma_declare_coherent_memory()
On Mon, 2023-07-24 at 20:43 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > arch/sh is being maintained again, so it's save to keep these boards. At some point, we're
> > going to convert the architecture to using Device Trees which should reduce the maintenance
> > burden anyways.
> 
> Keeping the architecture is fine for newer systems, but is anyone really
> maintaining the Renesas SH board ?
I own Renesas evaluation boards, including SH7785LCR-based and SH7724-based boards.
Adrian
-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
