[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230725110942.GB31069@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:09:42 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@...weicloud.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"open list:SUPERH" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>,
petr@...arici.cz, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] sh: boards: fix CEU buffer size passed to
dma_declare_coherent_memory()
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 07:50:56AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-07-24 at 20:43 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > arch/sh is being maintained again, so it's save to keep these boards. At some point, we're
> > > going to convert the architecture to using Device Trees which should reduce the maintenance
> > > burden anyways.
> >
> > Keeping the architecture is fine for newer systems, but is anyone really
> > maintaining the Renesas SH board ?
>
> I own Renesas evaluation boards, including SH7785LCR-based and
> SH7724-based boards.
Will you have time to port them to DT, or would you rather focus on
J-core systems ? Do those boards still boot a mainline kernel ?
Dropping Renesas SH board files doesn't preclude anyone from moving them
to DT, all the information will remain in the git history. Unless you
plan to move to DT in a reasonably near future, I think dropping support
for the CEU at least, if not the whole board files, could be a good
option.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists