linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] net: ethernet: mtk_eth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZL8dbpEwmA8G4Mq9@makrotopia.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 01:55:10 +0100
From:   Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add basic
 support for MT7988 SoC

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 04:00:24PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 22:57:08 +0100 Daniel Golle wrote:
> > The series should not conflict with Russell's recently submitted series
> > "Remove legacy phylink behaviour", hence the order of them being
> > picked into net-next doesn't matter.
> 
> Not sure what the exact conflict is, but:
> 
> Failed to apply patch:
> [...]

Some things got applied in the meantime, I've rebased once again and
sent v6 without any other changes made.