[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230724175612.0649ef67@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:56:12 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Lin Ma" <linma@....edu.cn>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: mqprio: Add length check for
TCA_MQPRIO_{MAX/MIN}_RATE64
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:15:39 +0800 (GMT+08:00) Lin Ma wrote:
> > > The nla_for_each_nested parsing in function mqprio_parse_nlattr() does
> > > not check the length of the nested attribute. This can lead to an
> > > out-of-attribute read and allow a malformed nlattr (e.g., length 0) to
> > > be viewed as 8 byte integer and passed to priv->max_rate/min_rate.
> > >
> > > This patch adds the check based on nla_len() when check the nla_type(),
> > > which ensures that the length of these two attribute must equals
> > > sizeof(u64).
> >
> > How do you run get_maintainer? You didn't CC the author of the code.
>
> That's weird, I just ran code below and send this patch to all 9 emails poped out.
>
> # ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl net/sched/sch_mqprio.c
Joe, here's another case.
Lin Ma, you need to run the script on the file generated by
git format-patch, rather than the file path. That gives better
coverage for keywords included in the commit message (especially
the Fixes tag). Please rerun it on the patch and repost with
the right CC list.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists