[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZL+LfqvL/tBGnUF3@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:44:46 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>,
Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MIPS: Fix build issues from the introduction of
`need-compiler'
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 03:37:13PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the addition of the `need-compiler' variable the `Makefile.compiler'
> fragment is not included with no-build targets such as `modules_install',
> which in turn means $(call cc-option,), etc. are no-ops with these targets
> and any attempt to evaluate these function calls causes all kinds of weird
> behaviour to happen.
>
> The solution is to avoid making these calls in the first place, as they
> are surely irrelevant where the compiler is not going to be otherwise
> invoked. This small patch series fixes two places known-affected in the
> MIPS Makefile fragment and also included a follow-up revert of an earlier
> misguided attempt. See individual change descriptions for details.
>
> Verified with `decstation_64_defconfig' and `fuloong2e_defconfig' using
> `modules_install'. Please apply.
series applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists