[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMFHs4MV6vUhwn7r@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 19:20:03 +0300
From: 'Andy Shevchenko' <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: 'kernel test robot' <lkp@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
"llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev" <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 2/5] minmax: Allow min()/max()/clamp() if the
arguments have the same signedness.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 08:30:59AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: kernel test robot
> > Sent: 25 July 2023 16:58
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
...
> > In file included from init/calibrate.c:8:
> > >> include/linux/jiffies.h:427:28: error: call to undeclared function 'static_assert'; ISO C99 and
> > later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > 427 | return jiffies_to_clock_t(max(0L, delta));
> > | ^
> ...
> > include/linux/minmax.h:29:3: note: expanded from macro '__cmp_once'
> > 29 | static_assert(__types_ok(x, y), \
>
> This is fixed by the earlier patch:
> [PATCH v1 1/1] minmax: Fix header inclusions
>
> which adds #include <linux/build_bug.h> and thus defines static_assert().
>
> Can I just assume that will be applied?
You can test that and reply there with your Tested-by there, it will help it
to be applied.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists