[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39d5316ee16e4588af888d68b77fdba1@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:47:13 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'kernel test robot' <lkp@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'Andy Shevchenko' <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
CC: "llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev" <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH next 2/5] minmax: Allow min()/max()/clamp() if the
arguments have the same signedness.
From: kernel test robot
> Sent: 25 July 2023 15:57
...
> >> mm/mm_init.c:908:14: error: static_assert expression is not an integral constant expression
> start_pfn = clamp(start_pfn, zone_start_pfn, zone_end_pfn);
..
> include/linux/minmax.h:45:17: note: expanded from macro '__clamp_once'
> static_assert(!__is_constexpr((lo) > (hi)) || (lo) <= (hi),
That didn't fail in my test builds.
The compiler I was using must short-circuited the ||.
I'll substitute a 'choose_expr' in v2.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists