[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <350c7fe495424138afd15d797830c417@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 08:30:59 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'kernel test robot' <lkp@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'Andy Shevchenko' <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
CC: "llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev" <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH next 2/5] minmax: Allow min()/max()/clamp() if the
arguments have the same signedness.
From: kernel test robot
> Sent: 25 July 2023 16:58
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>
...
>
> In file included from init/calibrate.c:8:
> >> include/linux/jiffies.h:427:28: error: call to undeclared function 'static_assert'; ISO C99 and
> later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 427 | return jiffies_to_clock_t(max(0L, delta));
> | ^
...
> include/linux/minmax.h:29:3: note: expanded from macro '__cmp_once'
> 29 | static_assert(__types_ok(x, y), \
This is fixed by the earlier patch:
[PATCH v1 1/1] minmax: Fix header inclusions
which adds #include <linux/build_bug.h> and thus defines static_assert().
Can I just assume that will be applied?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists