linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] x86/sev: Mark boot_ghcb_page and boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230726170659.2474934-1-lizetao1@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2023 17:06:59 +0000
From:   Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>
To:     <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     <lizetao1@...wei.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <thomas.lendacky@....com>, <rppt@...nel.org>,
        <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, <michael.roth@....com>,
        <nikunj@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next] x86/sev: Mark boot_ghcb_page and boot_ghcb static

This patch fixes the following sprse warning:

arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c:28:13: warning:
	symbol boot_ghcb_page was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c:29:13: warning:
	symbol boot_ghcb was not declared. Should it be static?

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>
---
 arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
index 09dc8c187b3c..323f6298a6b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
 #include "error.h"
 #include "../msr.h"
 
-struct ghcb boot_ghcb_page __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
-struct ghcb *boot_ghcb;
+static struct ghcb boot_ghcb_page __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
+static struct ghcb *boot_ghcb;
 
 /*
  * Copy a version of this function here - insn-eval.c can't be used in
-- 
2.34.1