linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: do not set the NUMA node of device if it has none

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230726131408.GA15909@lst.de>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:14:08 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: do not set the NUMA node of device if it has
 none

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:58:36AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>> For example, AWS EC2's i3.16xlarge instance does not expose NUMA
>>> information for the NVMe devices. This means all NVMe devices have
>>> NUMA_NO_NODE by default. Without this patch, random 4k read performance
>>> measured via fio on CPUs from node 1 (around 165k IOPS) is almost 50%
>>> less than CPUs from node 0 (around 315k IOPS). With this patch, CPUs on
>>> both nodes get similar performance (around 315k IOPS).
>>
>> irqbalance doesn't work with this driver though: the interrupts are
>> managed by the kernel. Is there some other reason to explain the perf
>> difference?
>
> Maybe its because the numa_node goes to the tagset which allocates
> stuff based on that numa-node ?

Yeah, the only explanation I could come up with is that without this
the allocations gets spread, and that somehow helps.  All of this
is a little obscure, but so is the NVMe practice of setting the node id
to first_memory_node, which no other driver does.  I'd really like to
understand what's going on here first.  After that this patch probably
is the right thing, I'd just like to understand why.