lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:08:14 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
        stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com, bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org,
        agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
        hans.verkuil@...co.com, tfiga@...omium.org
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] venus: hfi: add checks to perform sanity on queue
 pointers

On 27.07.2023 06:34, Vikash Garodia wrote:
> Read and write pointers are used to track the packet index in the memory
> shared between video driver and firmware. There is a possibility of OOB
> access if the read or write pointer goes beyond the queue memory size.
> Add checks for the read and write pointer to avoid OOB access.
> 
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: d96d3f30c0f2 ("[media] media: venus: hfi: add Venus HFI files")
> Signed-off-by: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c
> index f0b4638..dc228c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,10 @@ static int venus_write_queue(struct venus_hfi_device *hdev,
>  
>  	new_wr_idx = wr_idx + dwords;
>  	wr_ptr = (u32 *)(queue->qmem.kva + (wr_idx << 2));
> +
> +	if (wr_ptr < (u32 *)queue->qmem.kva || wr_ptr > (u32 *)(queue->qmem.kva + queue->qmem.size))
Shouldn't the cases on the right side of the OR operator include a
"- 1"?

Konrad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ