[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMLOJNGDlvlU1NBD@tassilo>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:05:56 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Parse event sort/regroup fixes
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:49:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 05:18:33PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > Patch 1, fix:
> > perf stat -e cycles,slots,topdown-fe-bound
> > so that cycles isn't made a group leader (failure caused by PMUs
> > matching). Previously this event list would fail so not necessarily a
> > regression over previous perf release.
> >
> > Patch 2, when regrouping events the leader needs to be updated due to
> > sorting. This fix causes larger event groups that then regress at
> > least the tigerlake metric test as the kernel PMU driver fails to
> > break the weak groups. This is a fix for a bug but the consequence of
> > fixing the bug is to make a passing test fail due to the kernel PMU
> > driver.
> >
> > Patch 3, don't alter the list position of events without a group if
> > they don't need forcing into a group. Analysis showed this was the
> > cause of the issue reported by Andi Kleen:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/ZLBgbHkbrfGygM%2Fu@tassilo/
>
> Andi,
>
> Can you please check these patches and provide a Tested-by?
Tested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists