linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config fragments for test runs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <81179172-cf6f-f5b9-c017-74aa6c95132a@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 14:59:43 +0100
From:   James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
        leo.yan@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org, Aishwarya.TCV@....com,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config
 fragments for test runs



On 28/07/2023 14:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 11:48:34AM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
>>
>>
>> On 30/06/2023 09:04, James Clark wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29/06/2023 23:03, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>>> Hi James,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 3:53 AM James Clark <james.clark@....com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since RFC:
>>>>>
>>>>>  * Changed arch filename convention to use the ARCH= build time values
>>>>>    instead of uname
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems like there were no objections on the RFC, apart from maybe
>>>>> changing the perf tests to run as a kself test. But that's probably not
>>>>> going to happen for a while, if ever, and these fragments can always
>>>>> be moved in that case.
>>>>
>>>> I missed the RFC, sorry.  Could you please add a link for that?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Namhyung
>>>
>>> Yep, it's here:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d02cce4a-47b1-a776-0d3a-a6a7c9a4d8fd@arm.com/T/
>>>
>>
>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>
>> Any interest in taking this one?
> 
> Yeah, looks useful, we can go on from this starting point and improve
> it.
> 
> I merged it into perf-tools-next.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Arnaldo
>  

Thanks Arnaldo!

>> Thanks
>> James
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> James Clark (1):
>>>>>   perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config fragments for test runs
>>>>>
>>>>>  tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/README |  7 +++++++
>>>>>  tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/arm64  |  1 +
>>>>>  tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/config | 11 +++++++++++
>>>>>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/README
>>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/arm64
>>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/config
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> base-commit: ad5f604e186ac08d12c401e34ea96c09c38ddbc5
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>>
>