linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config fragments for test runs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZMPCsEeO1Xad/pR6@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:29:20 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
        leo.yan@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org, Aishwarya.TCV@....com,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config
 fragments for test runs

Em Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 11:48:34AM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
> 
> 
> On 30/06/2023 09:04, James Clark wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 29/06/2023 23:03, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> Hi James,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 3:53 AM James Clark <james.clark@....com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Changes since RFC:
> >>>
> >>>  * Changed arch filename convention to use the ARCH= build time values
> >>>    instead of uname
> >>>
> >>> It seems like there were no objections on the RFC, apart from maybe
> >>> changing the perf tests to run as a kself test. But that's probably not
> >>> going to happen for a while, if ever, and these fragments can always
> >>> be moved in that case.
> >>
> >> I missed the RFC, sorry.  Could you please add a link for that?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Namhyung
> > 
> > Yep, it's here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d02cce4a-47b1-a776-0d3a-a6a7c9a4d8fd@arm.com/T/
> > 
> 
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> Any interest in taking this one?

Yeah, looks useful, we can go on from this starting point and improve
it.

I merged it into perf-tools-next.

Thanks,

- Arnaldo
 
> Thanks
> James
> 
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> James Clark (1):
> >>>   perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config fragments for test runs
> >>>
> >>>  tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/README |  7 +++++++
> >>>  tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/arm64  |  1 +
> >>>  tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/config | 11 +++++++++++
> >>>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> >>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/README
> >>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/arm64
> >>>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/config
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> base-commit: ad5f604e186ac08d12c401e34ea96c09c38ddbc5
> >>> --
> >>> 2.34.1
> >>>

-- 

- Arnaldo