[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230728150718.8odZX-jD@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:07:18 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
ThomasGleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 'perf test sigtrap' failing on PREEMPT_RT_FULL
On 2023-07-26 08:10:45 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > [ 52.848925] BUG: scheduling while atomic: perf/6549/0x00000002
>
> Had bf9ad37dc8a not been reverted due to insufficient beauty, you could
> trivially make the sigtrap test a happy camper (wart tested in tip-rt).
Thank you for the pointer Mike.
I guess we need this preempt_disable_notrace() in perf_pending_task()
due to context accounting in get_recursion_context(). Would a
migrate_disable() be sufficient or could we send the signal outside of
the preempt-disabled block?
This is also used in perf_pending_irq() and on PREEMPT_RT this is
invoked from softirq context which is preemptible.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists