lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fd67ff4c295ae01be79b5a0101c17bc5f5ef5bd.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:57:22 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:     "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu/SMT: Fix cpu_smt_possible() comment

Hi, Thomas,

On Fri, 2023-07-28 at 09:34 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10 2023 at 11:21, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > The comment of cpu_smt_possible() is not aligned with the changelog
> > of
> > commit e1572f1d08be ("cpu/SMT: create and export
> > cpu_smt_possible()"),
> > and it is wrong.
> 
> Why? Do I need to go and read that commit log and figure out what's
> wrong?
> 
> > Fix cpu_smt_possible() comment.
> 
> Zero information.
> 
Thanks for reviewing. Sent patch V2 with changelog rephrased.

thanks,
rui

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ