[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2024453-e749-b659-52a0-83ded8bb5c38@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:57:44 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org
Cc: helgaas@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com, quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com,
quic_skananth@...cinc.com, quic_ramkri@...cinc.com,
quic_parass@...cinc.com,
"reviewer:ARM/QUALCOMM CHROMEBOOK SUPPORT"
<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PCIe0 node
On 28/07/2023 17:10, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>
> On 7/28/2023 5:33 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/07/2023 12:39, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
>>> Add PCIe dtsi node for PCIe0 controller on sc7280 platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
>> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
>>
>>
>>> + pcie0_phy: phy@...6000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sm8250-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy";
>>> + reg = <0 0x01c06000 0 0x1c0>;
>>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>> + ranges;
>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_0_AUX_CLK>,
>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_0_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_CLKREF_EN>,
>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE0_PHY_RCHNG_CLK>;
>>> + clock-names = "aux", "cfg_ahb", "ref", "refgen";
>>> +
>>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_0_PHY_BCR>;
>>> + reset-names = "phy";
>>> +
>>> + assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE0_PHY_RCHNG_CLK>;
>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <100000000>;
>>> +
>>> + status = "disabled";
>>> +
>>> + pcie0_lane: phy@...e6200 {
>> Isn't this old-style of bindings? Wasn't there a change? On what tree
>> did you base it?
The work was here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230324022514.1800382-5-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org/
But I don't remember the status.
> Let me rebase and send it again.
This anyway looks like wrong compatible. You used sm8250.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists