[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db5f1478-8aca-fb57-c3fc-aa09071a0829@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 18:44:45 +0200
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] soundwire: bus: Allow SoundWire peripherals to
register IRQ handlers
On 7/28/23 17:18, Lee Jones wrote:
> Vinod, Bard, Pierre-Louis, Sanyog,
>
> This has been on the list for some time now.
>
> Would one of you please review this, so we can get it merged?
Sorry, I thought I provided my tag on an earlier version, but apparently
that never reached the ML. All my earlier feedback was taken into
account so no objections from me - just one typo below...
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Charles Keepax wrote:
>
>> From: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>
>>
>> Currently the in-band alerts for SoundWire peripherals can only
>> be communicated to the driver through the interrupt_callback
>> function. This however is slightly inconvient for devices that wish to
inconvenient
>> share IRQ handling code between SoundWire and I2C/SPI, the later would
>> normally register an IRQ handler with the IRQ subsystem. However there
>> is no reason the SoundWire in-band IRQs can not also be communicated
>> as an actual IRQ to the driver.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists