[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXvqJk9hA51pDSXodEWSP4DzN+RJ1scpyzJOrxk2w5kjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:54:02 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] perf: tests: Adapt mmap-basic.c for riscv
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 7:30 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com> wrote:
>
> riscv now supports mmaping hardware counters to userspace so adapt the test
> to run on this architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c b/tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c
> index e68ca6229756..f5075ca774f8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/mmap-basic.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct test_case tests__basic_mmap[] = {
> "permissions"),
> TEST_CASE_REASON("User space counter reading of instructions",
> mmap_user_read_instr,
> -#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__) || __riscv_xlen == 64
Same comment relating to the guard, why not defined(__riscv) ?
Thanks,
Ian
> "permissions"
> #else
> "unsupported"
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static struct test_case tests__basic_mmap[] = {
> ),
> TEST_CASE_REASON("User space counter reading of cycles",
> mmap_user_read_cycles,
> -#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__) || __riscv_xlen == 64
> "permissions"
> #else
> "unsupported"
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists