linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 49/50] dt-bindings: arm: add sam9x75 curiosity board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:25:32 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com, jerry.ray@...rochip.com,
        durai.manickamkr@...rochip.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 49/50] dt-bindings: arm: add sam9x75 curiosity board

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:01:06PM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add documentation for SAM9X75 Curiosity board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> index dfb8fd089197..15b11feae46a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> @@ -99,6 +99,12 @@ properties:
>            - const: microchip,sam9x60
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9
>  
> +      - description: Microchip SAM9X7 Evaluation Boards
> +        items:
> +          - const: microchip,sam9x75-curiosity
> +          - const: microchip,sam9x7
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9

Has this compatible been useful in prior use? Can s/w make some decision 
based on it? If not, I'd drop it.

Rob