linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 49/50] dt-bindings: arm: add sam9x75 curiosity board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 05:59:25 +0000
From:   <Varshini.Rajendran@...rochip.com>
To:     <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, <Jerry.Ray@...rochip.com>,
        <Durai.ManickamKR@...rochip.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 49/50] dt-bindings: arm: add sam9x75 curiosity board

On 29/07/23 12:55 am, Rob Herring wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:01:06PM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add documentation for SAM9X75 Curiosity board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
>> index dfb8fd089197..15b11feae46a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
>> @@ -99,6 +99,12 @@ properties:
>>             - const: microchip,sam9x60
>>             - const: atmel,at91sam9
>>
>> +      - description: Microchip SAM9X7 Evaluation Boards
>> +        items:
>> +          - const: microchip,sam9x75-curiosity
>> +          - const: microchip,sam9x7
>> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9
> 
> Has this compatible been useful in prior use? Can s/w make some decision
> based on it? If not, I'd drop it.

Hi Rob,

There is no s/w decision depending on this compatible per se. But this 
is how we have maintained different boards from the same SoC or SoC 
family so far. So I would say, any decision on this would require 
discussion internally.

> 
> Rob

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Varshini Rajendran.